Fold Commons

Class set · a printable, ages 15–18 and teachers

Journal club in four roles

Pick one paper a month. Start with one figure, not the abstract. Four people, four jobs; swap roles next time. Keep the Pitfall Card on the table.

Describer

Says what the figure shows, before anyone says what it means.

  1. What is on each axis, or in each panel, and in what units?
  2. What kind of picture is it: an experiment, a prediction or a toy model?
  3. What does the eye land on first, and is it what the caption says matters?

Notes:

Sceptic

Finds the strongest reason the figure might not mean what the authors say.

  1. How many things were measured (what is n), and how were they chosen?
  2. What would the figure look like if the claim were wrong?
  3. Which square on the Pitfall Card could apply here?

Notes:

Translator

Puts the finding into plain words for someone outside the room.

  1. Say the finding in two sentences with no jargon.
  2. Which word in the paper needed a gloss, and what is it?
  3. What should a news story about this figure not say?

Notes:

Auditor

Checks what the paper gives so others can check it.

  1. Are the data and code available, and where?
  2. Is the confidence of each prediction shown, and how?
  3. Is the paper free to read, and under what licence?

Notes:

How a session runs (about 40 minutes)

  1. Everyone looks at the one figure for three minutes, without reading the text.
  2. The Describer goes first. Nobody interprets until the figure has been described.
  3. The Sceptic, then the Translator, then the Auditor. Each has five minutes.
  4. Open discussion. End by writing one sentence the group agrees the figure shows, and one it does not.

Paper: ________________________________ Figure: ______ Date: ____________

Three open-access papers to start with

Each is free to read at its DOI. The four roles are a design for a discussion, not a tested method; no study shows what this format teaches.